Wise AI Ambassador

Exercises and gates

Studied elsewhere, or already know the material? Start here: the six gates with their worked examples, and every exercise with a place to answer it.

The six degrees

Pick a degree to see its gate.

Your journey · 0/6 gates passed
  • Read ahead as you like, but do not count a degree done before you pass its gate.
  • Do not believe anything here until you have tested it with your own hands. Knowledge that is not tried is not knowledge, it is an impression.
Degree 1 of 06

You Are Here

  • The human
  • Knowledge

You name your position relative to the technology, precisely.

To enterNothing. This is zero.

The degree's exercises

  1. Your tasks and machine limitsUnit 1 · A world that learns without you1 h 5 min

    Unit 1 · A world that learns without you

    1 — Think15 min

    Write down three tasks you carry out weekly that take more than an hour. Against each one put: is it essentially knowledge, judgement, or relationship?

    An example

    One possible answer, to show what a good one looks like; write yours from your own work.

    Task one: screening CVs for open posts — three hours a week — essentially knowledge. Task two: final interviews with candidates — two hours — essentially judgement. Task three: the follow-up session with new starters — an hour and a half — essentially relationship. What I took from it: the first is what will change first; the third no AI system will take from me.

    2 — Try it on the tool20 min

    Ask an AI system to explain a subject you know thoroughly. Record: what it got right, what it got wrong, and what looked right and was wrong.

    An example

    One possible answer, to show what a good one looks like; write yours from your own work.

    The subject: storing vaccines in the cold chain at the pharmacy where I work. What it got right: the need for a daily temperature log, and never keeping vaccines in the fridge door. What it got wrong: it said a vaccine frozen by mistake can be used once it thaws. What looked right and was wrong: it gave one shelf life for an opened vial across all vaccines, when it differs by each vaccine's leaflet — and it wrote it so confidently I nearly copied it.

    3 — Apply it in your field30 min

    Find a documented case where AI failed in your profession. Where was the point of failure: in the tool, or in whoever trusted it?

    An example

    One possible answer, to show what a good one looks like; write yours from your own work.

    My profession: a journalist on the business news desk. The case: a technology news site published dozens of articles written by an AI tool, then had to correct many of them after readers found errors in the figures and calculations. The point of failure: whoever trusted it. The tool makes arithmetic errors, as expected; the real failure was editors publishing without review. What I will do: no figure goes out under my name before I have opened its source myself.

  2. Your myths and data ruleUnit 2 · Seven myths holding you back30 min

    Unit 2 · Seven myths holding you back

    1 — Think5 min

    Put a mark against the myth you used to believe. If you find none, read it again.

    An example

    One possible answer, to show what a good one looks like; write yours from your own work.

    The myth I used to believe: the fourth, "what I type into it stays private". The evidence: last month I pasted my whole class's marks sheet, with the pupils' names, to ask for an analysis of their results. What I will change: I replace the names with numbers before any analysis, or do it in a spreadsheet on my own computer.

    2 — Try it on the tool15 min

    Ask for a specific academic reference in your speciality, with author and year, then check whether it exists at all.

    An example

    One possible answer, to show what a good one looks like; write yours from your own work.

    What I asked for: an academic reference on the prevalence of diabetes among older people in Egypt, with author and year. What it gave me: three references, each with an author, a year and a journal. What I found in the hospital library's database: the first exists; the second has a real author but no such paper; the third has no trace at all. The result: one correct reference out of three, and all three written with the same confidence.

    3 — Apply it in your field10 min

    Write one rule beginning "I will never put in…", named to the kind of data your profession handles.

    An example

    One possible answer, to show what a good one looks like; write yours from your own work.

    My profession: an accountant at an audit firm. My rule: I will never put clients' account statements, their bank account numbers or their financial statements before publication into any public AI system — not even with the names removed. Why "not even with the names removed": in a small market the figures alone are enough to identify the client.

  3. Your diagnosis, checked by othersUnit 3 · Where do you stand? The diagnostic55 min

    Unit 3 · Where do you stand? The diagnostic

    1 — For the gate20 min

    Colour the matrix honestly, and write today's date underneath it. It is half of this degree's gate.

    An example

    One possible answer, to show what a good one looks like; write yours from your own work.

    I coloured the matrix in pen in my work notebook, stopping at the first description that honestly applied to me. People: 2 — knowledge: 3 — system: 1 — impact: 1. The date underneath: 12 October 2026. My note: I know the terms better than I build anything with them — I am a maintenance engineer, not a programmer, and it shows.

    2 — Try it on the tool20 min

    Ask an AI system to test you on the terms you claimed to know — with applied questions, not definitions. Correct your estimate.

    An example

    One possible answer, to show what a good one looks like; write yours from your own work.

    The terms I claimed to know: hallucination, the context window, and tokens. I asked it for five applied questions from my work in marketing, not definitions. The result: I got hallucination right, and got two questions on the context window wrong — I assumed the system remembers last month's campaigns from an old conversation. My corrected estimate: knowledge down from 3 to 2.

    3 — Apply it in your field15 min

    Ask a colleague who knows your work to rate you on "system" and "impact". The gap between their rating and yours is the most useful piece of information in this degree.

    An example

    One possible answer, to show what a good one looks like; write yours from your own work.

    Whom I asked: Sara, who has coordinated programmes with me at the charity for three years. My own rating: system 3, impact 2. Her rating of me: system 1, impact 2. Her reason: "You use the tools well, but you haven't built anything anyone else uses." The most useful thing I learnt: a two-degree gap on system, and that is where I start.

  4. Your route, scope and contractUnit 4 · Your plan: from the map to the climb40 min

    Unit 4 · Your plan: from the map to the climb

    1 — Think15 min

    Look at the weakest dimension you coloured in your matrix, and from the routes in "How to use this programme" pick the one that starts from it. Write down, by number, the first three units you will read.

    An example

    One possible answer, to show what a good one looks like; write yours from your own work.

    The weakest dimension I coloured: knowledge (1). The route I picked: the non-technical professional — 1 → 2 → 3 → my field's unit → 4.4 → 5 — because it goes through the foundation first. The first three units I will read: 2.1, then 2.2, then 2.3. My profession: an emergency department nurse; I read a unit every two days after my shift.

    2 — Apply it in your field15 min

    Name the scope you lead, where you will work the gates of degrees four, five and six: your team, department or project. Write its name, how many people are in it, and who holds authority over it. If you lead nothing at work yet, a volunteer or community initiative you lead is a scope of leadership too.

    An example

    One possible answer, to show what a good one looks like; write yours from your own work.

    The scope I lead: the mathematics department at the secondary school where I am deputy head. How many people are in it: nine teachers and one administrator. Who holds authority over it: the head teacher, Mr Ahmed — and I have told him I will work the gates of degrees 4, 5 and 6 with the department.

    3 — For the gate10 min

    Fill in the contract in this degree's gate, then send the date to the person you named — today, not tomorrow.

    An example

    One possible answer, to show what a good one looks like; write yours from your own work.

    My weakest dimension is: knowledge. I will start at degree 2, unit 1. I will finish its gate before: 30 November. The person I will show the output to is: Dr Khaled, head of the civil engineering department. I sent him this today at four o'clock: "I'll show you my page on how a machine learns before 30 November."

Gate 1 · Deliverable
A coloured assessment matrix + a signed contract

What you do: Colour the four dimensions of your own matrix, then sign the contract with yourself: your weakest dimension, the degree and chapter you start from, the date you will pass its gate, and the person you will show the output to.

You have passed when: You named a real person and a real date. An output nobody sees does not get made.

Expected time: About half an hour.

A worked example

Invented, to show what is enough. Yours will look different.

My weakest dimension is: the system. I start at degree 2, unit 1. I will pass its gate before: 15 November. The person I will show the output to is: Mona, my direct manager — I told her the date today. Where I coloured my matrix: in my notebook — the human 3, knowledge 2, the system 1, impact 2 — dated today.

Exercises and the gate